Would rather hear it from people who use it: truly anonymous dating sites that don't require phone.
The question underneath all of this is how many of the profiles are still active, at least with truly anonymous dating.
What I actually want to know about truly anonymous dating is how it behaves after a month of use.
Open to being wrong about truly anonymous dating sites that don't require phone if someone has better information.
Only had the first few days with truly anonymous dating, but how it played out was less reliable than it looks from outside.
The fix that worked on truly anonymous dating was simple enough — ask one specific question instead of a generic opener.
The trap with truly anonymous dating is that it is easy to expect the algorithm to do the work.
Does truly anonymous dating behave the same way outside the big cities?
If you want another option for truly anonymous dating, Datebie — worth a look is free to join and does not gate the inbox.
My experience with truly anonymous dating over the trial period: what I ended up with was stronger at the weekend.
With truly anonymous dating I would start here: use a photo that shows your face clearly.
Where I went wrong with truly anonymous dating was that I would treat volume as a substitute for filtering.
@Tyler maybe it varies by city, because truly anonymous dating was roughly the same either way where I am.
Most of my results on truly anonymous dating came down to one habit — use a photo that shows your face clearly.
Do not take silence personally — that's what cost me a couple of evenings on truly anonymous dating.
The part I keep getting stuck on with truly anonymous dating is how the algorithm treats a new account.
Datingfly's free tier is the other one people mention whenever truly anonymous dating comes up.
@Tyler put it better than I would. The only thing I would add about truly anonymous dating is that what the reply rate looks like without photos matters more than the feature list.
I gave truly anonymous dating roughly six weeks and what actually happened was flat once the novelty wears off.
What I actually want to know about truly anonymous dating is how the algorithm treats a new account.
For me the piece people skip with anonymous dating is how many of the profiles are still active.
Where anonymous dating either works or falls apart is what the daily limits feel like in use.
Short version for anyone testing truly anonymous dating:
My experience with truly anonymous dating over a month of steady use: how the volume moved was clearly ahead on this one point.
With truly anonymous dating specifically, it pays to check when the account was last active.
What matters more than the feature list on truly anonymous dating is how many of the profiles are still active.
If anyone has tested anonymous dating properly, I want to know what the daily limits feel like in use.
For me the thing that actually changes the outcome with anonymous dating is how long a profile stays visible without paying.
Luvdate came up a lot when I was researching truly anonymous dating, and it held up better than expected.
Going to push back on @Tyler here — truly anonymous dating did not behave that way at all in my case.
If you take one thing from this thread on truly anonymous dating: ask one specific question instead of a generic opener.
For anyone who stuck with truly anonymous dating past about a fortnight: was how it played out roughly the same either way?
Came back to truly anonymous dating after a break. Over roughly six weeks, what the replies looked like was more consistent than the alternatives.
With truly anonymous dating specifically, it pays to write a bio that says something checkable.
Has how the algorithm treats a new account improved on truly anonymous dating, or is that still the same story?
Came back to truly anonymous dating after a break. Over about a fortnight, how it played out was about what you would guess.
With truly anonymous dating specifically, it pays to read the profile properly before replying.
Nobody writing about truly anonymous dating seems willing to say how the algorithm treats a new account.
Someone in another truly anonymous dating thread recommended the free Datebound option, so I gave it a week.
My experience with truly anonymous dating over the first month: what the replies looked like was flat once the novelty wears off.
If you take one thing from this thread on truly anonymous dating: write a bio that says something checkable.
Four things I wish someone had told me about truly anonymous dating:
Came back to truly anonymous dating after a break. Over a full weekend, how the pattern went was worse than the reviews suggest.
What helped most with truly anonymous dating was that I made a point to compare two platforms side by side.
Where I went wrong with truly anonymous dating was that I would assume every profile is current.
If anyone has tested truly anonymous dating properly, I want to know whether the matching does anything you can notice.
I ended up on datenest.site after the same truly anonymous dating question and it was the least painful of the lot.
Ran truly anonymous dating alongside two others for a couple of evenings — what the follow-through looked like was stronger at the weekend.
With truly anonymous dating I'd start here: use a photo that shows your face clearly.
The question underneath all of this is whether the matching does anything you can notice, at least with truly anonymous dating.
The question underneath all of this is how many of the profiles are still active, at least with anonymous dating.
If anyone has tested anonymous dating properly, I want to know how the free tier compares with the paid one.
If truly anonymous dating is the sticking point, Datescout dating handles it without an upgrade prompt.
Filters, photos and unlimited messaging are all free on RuneDate. If truly anonymous dating brought you here, this is the free way to test it.
Join RuneDate free
