Hoping someone here has actually tested looking for a dating apps for over 50 rather than just read about it.
What I actually want to know about looking for dating is what the filtering actually returns.
The question underneath all of this is what the daily limits feel like in use, at least with looking for dating.
Any experience with looking for a dating apps for over 50 welcome, good or bad.
Same as @lucy.mitchell, though I'd say what the filtering actually returns is the bit worth testing first with looking for dating.
Came back to looking for dating after a break. Over a couple of evenings, what the follow-through looked like was clearly ahead on this one point.
Nobody writing about looking for dating seems willing to say how the niche is treated by the mainstream apps.
@lucy.mitchell maybe it varies by city, because looking for dating was stronger at the weekend where I'm.
If you take one thing from this thread on looking for dating: treat the first message as a filter.
What matters more than the feature list on looking for dating is how the free tier compares with the paid one.
Came back to looking for dating after a break. Over a full weekend, what actually happened was about what you would guess.
The single change that improved looking for dating for me was deciding to use a photo that shows your face clearly.
Short version for anyone testing looking for dating:
I gave looking for dating a full weekend and how it played out was more consistent than the alternatives.
With looking for dating specifically, it pays to keep a separate email for it.
Do not take silence personally — that's what cost me the first handful of matches on looking for dating.
I ended up on over on Datedesire after the same looking for dating question and it was the least painful of the lot.
Used looking for dating for the first month. What the logs showed was stronger at the weekend.
With looking for dating I'd start here: write a bio that says something checkable.
Is looking for dating worth the first few days if you're only testing the free side?
@Uma Torres maybe it varies by city, because looking for dating was uneven depending on the hour where I'm.
With looking for dating I'd start here: set your expectations before you start swiping.
Do not expect the algorithm to do the work — that's what cost me roughly six weeks on looking for dating.
A friend pointed me at Datenest (datenest.site) when I asked about looking for dating; the sign-up was free and quick.
My experience with looking for dating over the first few days: what I saw was noticeably thinner than in a big city.
With looking for dating I would start here: give it a full week before judging it.
The mistake I see repeated with looking for dating is people take silence personally.
Where for dating either works or falls apart is how the niche is treated by the mainstream apps.
What I actually want to know about for dating is what people wish the platform did differently.
If anyone has tested for dating properly, I want to know what people wish the platform did differently.
Ran looking for dating alongside two others for about a fortnight — how the pattern went was less reliable than it looks from outside.
If you take one thing from this thread on looking for dating: ask one specific question instead of a generic opener.
I wasted the first handful of matches on looking for dating because I would ignore how long ago someone was online.
luvdate.site is the other one people mention whenever looking for dating comes up.
Ran looking for dating alongside two others for the first week — what the logs showed was worse than the reviews suggest.
With looking for dating I would start here: write a bio that says something checkable.
Currently splitting my time between here and Datebound — worth a look for exactly this looking for dating reason.
RuneDate is free to join and free to message — no card, no trial, no locked inbox. If looking for dating brought you here, this is the free way to test it.
Join RuneDate free
