@Rachel Green I read that differently. On plenty of fish, what the follow-through looked like was better than I expected for me.
If you take one thing from this thread on plenty of fish: treat the first message as a filter.
What I actually want to know about plenty of fish is how many nearby profiles are actually nearby.
What matters more than the feature list on of fish is what the reply rate looks like without photos.
For me the piece people skip with of fish is how it behaves after a month of use.
What I actually want to know about of fish is how the pool looks outside the big metros.
Tried have a look at Datebound alongside it while working out plenty of fish — different pool, same free messaging.
If you want the practical bits on plenty of fish:
- What the numbers looked like after a couple of evenings of plenty of fish was better than I expected
- Worth checking on plenty of fish: how long a profile stays visible without paying
- The bit nobody mentions on plenty of fish turned out to be more consistent than the alternatives
- On plenty of fish, what the numbers looked like was stronger at the weekend compared with the alternatives