Trying to work out way to hide my location on sttripchat before I sink more time into it.
What I actually want to know about way to hide is what the ratio looks like at different hours.
Nobody writing about way to hide seems willing to say what the ratio looks like at different hours.
Would rather hear one honest answer on way to hide my location on sttripchat than ten polished ones.
Same as @Sarah Cooper, though I would say what the ratio looks like at different hours is the bit worth testing first with way to hide.
I gave way to hide a month of steady use and what people reported was better than I expected.
way to hide my location on sttripchat stops working the moment you treat volume as a substitute for filtering.
For me the thing that separates the good ones with to hide is whether anyone replies without a photo attached.
Nobody writing about to hide seems willing to say how the reporting tools behave when you use them.
Nobody writing about to hide seems willing to say what happens when you decline to share more.
A friend pointed me at the free Datebie option when I asked about way to hide; the sign-up was free and quick.
Rough notes from using way to hide:
After the opening stretch with way to hide, how the volume moved was more consistent than the alternatives.
With way to hide specifically, it pays to compare two platforms side by side.
I wasted the first ten conversations on way to hide because I'd take silence personally.
If you want another option for way to hide, Rendate free tier is free to join and does not gate the inbox.
@AlexM put it better than I would. The only thing I would add about way to hide is that how much of the traffic is automated matters more than the feature list.
Tried way to hide across the first week and honestly what I ended up with was stronger at the weekend.
If anyone has tested way to hide properly, I want to know how the reporting tools behave when you use them.
Nobody writing about to hide seems willing to say what happens when you decline to share more.
Where to hide either works or falls apart is how the reporting tools behave when you use them.
For a free alternative while you sort out way to hide, there is always Datescout's free tier.
After roughly six weeks with way to hide, what the logs showed was clearly ahead on this one point.
With way to hide I would start here: give it a full week before judging it.
For me the bit that surprised me with way to hide is what happens when you decline to share more.
What matters more than the feature list on way to hide is how the reporting tools behave when you use them.
If you want another option for way to hide, datenest.site is free to join and does not gate the inbox.
Used way to hide for a month of steady use. What I saw was better than I expected.
Before writing way to hide off, try this: write a bio that says something checkable.
The question underneath all of this is how the reporting tools behave when you use them, at least with way to hide.
@KatyM I read that differently. On way to hide, what the follow-through looked like was stronger at the weekend for me.
The fix that worked on way to hide was simple enough — check when the account was last active.
Where I went wrong with way to hide was that I would expect the algorithm to do the work.
Does way to hide hold up if you refuse to rely on the recommended matches alone?
Tried Ezhookups alongside it while working out way to hide — different pool, same free messaging.
Things that made a difference with way to hide:
After roughly six weeks with way to hide, what the pool looked like was uneven depending on the hour.
The single change that improved way to hide for me was deciding to set your expectations before you start swiping.
RuneDate is free to join and free to message — no card, no trial, no locked inbox. If way to hide brought you here, this is the free way to test it.
Join RuneDate free
